AI Adoption and Readiness in Manufacturing

Interesting review on AI readiness and maturity towards the AI implementation in manufacturing firms

Bea Vallina, PhD.

7/23/20252 min leer

a large circular object in a large building
a large circular object in a large building

HEIMBERGER, H., HORVAT, D., JÄGER, A. y SCHULTMANN, F., 2025. Exploring AI Adoption in Manufacturing: An Empirical Study on Effects of AI Readiness. International Journal of Production Economics, pp. 109733. ISSN 0925-5273.

  • DOI 10.1016/j.ijpe.2025.109733.

  • Quantitative Survey Study / Large-scale empirical analysis. Germany. Manufacturing (general) - applicable to Food Processing, Dairy, Meat. Full-scale (1,334 firms)

Technologies:

  • AI applications (machine learning, pattern recognition).

  • Self-learning algorithms with pattern recognition capabilities. Various levels from standalone to fully integrated production systems.

Industrial applications:

  • Production process management

  • Quality control

  • Predictive maintenance

  • Internal logistics management

Maturity and readiness

  • Tech: "Majority of companies fall into medium (49%) or high (40%) technological readiness categories. Solid technological foundation established."

  • Eco-fin: "Gap between AI readiness and actual adoption suggests apprehension towards implementation. 14% adoption rate despite higher readiness levels."

  • Organisational: "High level organisational readiness less frequently achieved (28%). One in four manufacturers exhibit no (5%) or only low (20%) organisational readiness."

  • Supply chain: "AI applications in internal logistics management (6% adoption). Supply chain integration limited but present."

  • Legal framework: "Data security measures: 60% implement few measures, 33% various security measures. Regulatory compliance addressed through security protocols."

Results

  • AI Adoption Rate

    • 14% of German manufacturing companies

    • Binary variable (0/1) across 4 application areas

    • Representative sample

  • Technological Readiness

    • 89% medium-high level

    • Ordinal scale (0-4 levels)

    • Statistically significant

  • Organisational

    • 75% medium-high level

    • Ordinal scale (0-4 levels)

    • p<0.05

  • Combined Readiness Impact

    • 3x higher odds

    • Logistic regression OR=3.04

    • p<0.01

Implementation factors

Levers

  • Data availability (82% basic-large), IT infrastructure (69% adequate), security measures (93% implemented)

  • Clear ROI expectations for complex product manufacturers

  • Training programmes (81% offered), innovation culture (73% present), R&D cooperation (57%)

  • Industry sector influence (automotive 31% vs others ~14%)

Barriers

  • Limited integration capabilities, legacy system constraints

  • Unclear returns on investment, cost concerns for medium-sized firms

  • Skills gaps (47% lack digital skills), resistance to change, cultural barriers

  • Regulatory uncertainty, sector-specific constraints (chemicals/pharma 7% adoption)

KEY findings

  • Finding 1: Despite relatively high AI readiness levels (89% technological, 75% organisational), actual adoption remains low (14%), indicating implementation hesitancy.

  • Finding 2: Combined AI readiness significantly more predictive than individual dimensions - holistic approach essential for successful adoption.

  • Finding 3: Structural characteristics crucial - product complexity provides 3x advantage, firm size shows U-shaped relationship.

  • Finding 4: Organisational readiness emerges as more critical than technological readiness for actual implementation success.